Code Review & Analysis
Code review and analysis
On your machine. On your terms.
Investigate a refactor, review a commit or trace an unfamiliar change. Mnemon brings symbols, dependency graphs, Git history and maintenance signals into a standalone workspace. No coding agent or IDE extension required.
01
Read the code in context
Browse projects, symbols and Markdown in Code Explorer. Inspect a symbol's members and available relationships, with source, planning documents and history within reach.
02
Explore the neighborhood before editing
Focus Dependency Graph on a symbol, choose the depth and filter relationship kinds. Inspect available callers, outgoing relationships and implementations in the graph and its result list. Coverage follows the index and language provider, not every possible runtime dependency.
03
Look beyond the current version
Follow member, signature and document-heading changes across commits, including supported move events. Return to the source or patch when you need to inspect a particular revision.
04
Follow a commit into the implementation
Start with the changed files, inspect the relevant symbols and compare the change with its history. Source and commit references keep review findings tied to the revision you examined.
05
Keep the explanation with the change
Write a Commit Note yourself or with an agent to record decisions and tradeoffs behind a change. Save the Markdown into your repository and commit it; once indexed, the explanation is discoverable in Mnemon and through MCP.
06
Inspect ownership and change signals
Find frequently changing areas, historical contributors and files that tend to change together. Hotspot, coupling and potentially unused-code signals help prioritize investigation.
These are review aids, not automatic approval or proof that code is safe to remove. Ownership reflects recorded contributions, and co-change is not necessarily a direct dependency.
07
Keep the plan in view
Revisit the implementation brief alongside the code and commits that followed. Inspect what was planned and what changed without treating a completed checklist as proof of correctness.